Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 May;9(3):310-2. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31816c7151.

Abstract

Objective: To assess cardiac output in pediatric patients with the pressure recording analytical method (PRAM) and the Doppler echocardiography method. PRAM derives cardiac output from beat-by-beat analysis of the arterial pressure profile (systolic and diastolic phase) in the time domain.

Design: A prospective observational study.

Setting: Pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Patients: Forty-eight patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 yrs.

Interventions: Femoral or radial artery catheterization and mechanical ventilation.

Measurements and main results: Cardiac output was simultaneously estimated by Doppler echocardiography and PRAM. Cardiac output values obtained by Doppler echocardiography (2.7 +/- 1.6 L/min, range 0.92-8.20) were significantly correlated with those estimated by PRAM (2.6 +/- 1.7 L/min, range 0.89-7.48; r2 = .99, p < .01). The mean difference between the two estimates was 0.12 +/- 0.27 L x min(-1) (95% confidence interval, -0.54 to 0.77 L x min(-1)).

Conclusions: In the range of ages evaluated, PRAM provides reliable estimates of cardiac output when compared with noninvasive techniques.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Blood Pressure*
  • Cardiac Output*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Echocardiography, Doppler*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
  • Male
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Prospective Studies