Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Chest Med. 2008 Jun;29(2):313-21, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2008.01.003.

Effects of respiratory-therapist driven protocols on house-staff knowledge and education of mechanical ventilation.

Author information

  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 2634, Durham, NC 27710, USA. chia0002@mc.duke.edu

Abstract

High practice variability in critical care medicine contributes to medical errors and the high cost of ICU care. Clinical guidelines and protocol-based strategies can reduce the variation and cost of ICU medicine, increase adherence to evidence-based interventions, and reduce error, thereby improving the morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients. There are various barriers to guideline adherence, and protocols often are more successful when implemented by nonphysicians. However, this has potential consequences for house-staff knowledge and education. This article discusses the implications of mechanical ventilation protocols on patient care and medical education, and this article offers suggestions for synchronizing the processes for improving patient care to improve medical education.

PMID:
18440439
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk