Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Aug;23(6):513-7. doi: 10.1002/hup.947.

Comparison of craving and withdrawal among four combination nicotine treatments.

Author information

  • 1Nicotine Dependence Research Unit, Veteran Affairs Greater Los Angeles (VAGLA) Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California 90073, USA. ngs@ucla.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the appearance of craving and withdrawal among four combination nicotine replacement treatments (NRTs).

METHODS:

In a crossover trial of NRT preferences, 27 smokers tested 4 combinations of nicotine treatments: 2 mg/4 mg gums + 15 mg patch, 2 mg/4 mg lozenges + 15 mg patch, inhalers + 15 mg patch, and 10 + 15 mg double patch (approximately 25 mg). Overnight abstinence was required prior to (1/2) day testing of each combination. Combination NRTs were used for approximately 6 h/day. Subjects resumed smoking each afternoon. For this report, we used the Smoker Anchored Withdrawal Grid to look at craving and withdrawal scores over 5 days of testing (smoking baseline + four treatment days).

RESULTS:

"Urge to smoke" and "total withdrawal" showed a rise from baseline to NRT use for the double patch but not for the three acute + patch conditions. Lozenge/patch scores did not rise from baseline for "craving" and "miss a cigarette" but did for gum/patch, inhaler/patch, and double patch. The best relief occurred for NRTs of choice.

CONCLUSION:

This was a small but suggestive finding regarding the potential of patch plus adjunct ad lib NRT. With little data on relief with NRT combinations, more systematic tests are needed.

Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk