Effect of unilateral AC lesions on discrimination of gap durations in segmented FM sweeps: Three representative examples of the correlation between gap duration and number of nonreinforced conditioned responses in test sessions of experiments shown in Fig. 3. In A and B, CS+ with 50-ms gaps and CS− with no gaps were used; in C, CS+ with no gaps and CS− with 50-ms gaps were used as reinforced stimuli. (A) Gap-duration discrimination in left and right AC-lesioned animals (test session no. 7 in Fig. 3C): Only in LesR animals, i.e., with left AC intact, responses vary with gap duration. LesL, r = 0.1785, P = 0.672; LesR, r = 0.9358, P = 0.0006. (B) Gap duration discrimination in session no. 7 (before lesion, gray) and in session no. 17 (after lesion, black) in left and right AC-lesioned animals (from Fig. 3D): After lesion, responses vary with gap duration when left AC is intact. Session no. 7: LesL, r = 0.7835, P = 0.0214; LesR, r = 0.8328, P = 0.0103; session no. 17: LesL, r = 0.1011, P = 0.8117; LesR, r = 0.8643, P = 0.0056. (C) Gap-duration discrimination in session no. 7 (before lesion, gray) and in session no. 17 (after lesion, black) in left and right AC-lesioned animals (from Fig. 3E): Dependence of responses on gap duration with intact left AC like in Fig. 4 A and B but reversed correlation because of CS reversal. Session no. 7: LesL, r = 0.8718, P = 0.0048; LesR, r = 0.8549, P = 0.0068; session no.17: LesL, r = 0.0869, P = 0.8377; LesR, r = 0.7111, P = 0.0480.