Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Minerva Anestesiol. 2008 May;74(5):173-9.

    Efficacy of propofol compared to midazolam as an intravenous premedication agent.

    Source

    Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND:

    It is common practice to administer a premedication to patients about to undergo anesthesia. This study compared the effects of a small intravenous bolus of propofol versus midazolam administered as a premedication.

    METHODS:

    In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 60 healthy adult subjects scheduled for general anesthesia were given midazolam (0.04 mg/kg), propofol (0.4 mg/kg) or saline intravenously in the anesthesia waiting room. Before administration and three times at 2.5 min intervals subsequently, blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation and scores for anxiety and dizziness were recorded. Recall of words and images shown to the patient 5 min after drug administration was tested 10-30 min after recovery from anesthesia.

    RESULTS:

    Both propofol and midazolam helped relieve anxiety and lowered blood pressure (P<0.001, compared to baseline), but both were associated with greater dizziness scores (P<0.001, compared to placebo). Compared to placebo and propofol, midazolam was associated with more frequent respiratory depression (P<0.05) and significant impairment of anterograde explicit memory (P<0.05).

    CONCLUSION:

    Propofol may be an economical and safe alternative to midazolam for i.v. premedication.

    PMID:
    18414360
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    Free full text

      Supplemental Content

      Click here to read

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk