Bioinformatic evidence for the endogenous usage of both miRNAs and miRNA* species as regulatory RNAs. (a) miRNA-miRNA* sequence evolution. Above is a schematic of a typical miRNA hairpin, showing that the miRNA seed pairs to the 3′ end of the miRNA*, and vice versa. Analysis of all miRNAs (below, dark green) shows that miRNA termini are more conserved than their central regions, but that windows 1–7 and 2–8 are the most highly conserved. Similar trends apply to the subset of 65 highly conserved (HC) miRNAs and miRNA* species; the highest-scoring portion of the graph has been enlarged (middle). (b) The relative conservation of 3′ UTR complements to 7-nt windows across the 65 HC miRNA-miRNA* (above) and 20 poorly conserved (PC) miRNA/miRNA* (below), assessed between D. melanogaster and its distant relatives D. mojavensis and D. virilis. There is preferential conservation of heptamers complementary to positions 1–7 and 2–8 (and, to a lesser extent, 3–9) of both miRNAs and miRNA* species. (c) The proportion of 3′ UTR matches to miRNA 2–8 seeds that are conserved between D. melanogaster (Dm) and the increasingly divergent species D. simulans (Ds), D. yakuba (Dy), D. ananassae (Da), D. pseudoobscura (Dp), D. mojavensis (Dmo) and D. virilis (Dv). The signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of HC miRNA and miRNA* seeds, but not of PC seeds, increases steadily with evolutionary distance. (d) Estimated number of conserved target sites for HC miRNAs-miRNA*s. miRNA and miRNA* seeds with similar hit frequencies as their controls in Dm (left) have more conserved matches than their controls in Dmo/Dv (right).