Impact of the "60% rule" on inpatient medical reha...[Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008] - PubMed Result

SearchDatabase nameforSearch term

Advanced Search

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 0

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Apr;87(4):255-7. Links

Impact of the "60% rule" on inpatient medical rehabilitation.

PMID: 18356617 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related articles

Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for FY 2006. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 2005 Aug 15; 70(156):47879-8006.

[Fed Regist. 2005]
Medicare program; prospective payment system for inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 2001 Aug 7; 66(152):41315-430.

[Fed Regist. 2001]
Medicare program; inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system for federal fiscal year 2008. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 2007 Aug 7; 72(151):44283-335.

[Fed Regist. 2007]
ReviewThe state-of-the-science: challenges in designing postacute care payment policy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov; 88(11):1522-5.

[Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007]
ReviewInterventional techniques in ambulatory surgical centers: a look at the new payment system.
Pain Physician. 2007 Sep; 10(5):627-50.

[Pain Physician. 2007]
» See reviews... | » See all...

Recent Activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Impact of the "60% rule" on inpatient medical rehabilitation.Impact of the "60% rule" on inpatient medical rehabilitation.

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Display Show