Automatic Detection of Chromosomal Aberrations in Heterogeneous Tissue Samples
In each panel, the BAF and the logR ratio are plotted along chromosomal regions. The black boxes at the bottom represent detection with SOMATICs and other currently available methods, namely, Beadstudio LOH score (y axis range from 0 to 5), dChip (default detection threshold), and CNVPartition.
(A) Small germline deletion is revealed as a decreased logR ratio (−0.5), and the band of heterozygous SNPs centered on 0.5 is absent on the BAF plot.
(B–E) Various types of somatic deletions revealed on the BAF plot in which the single band of heterozygous SNPs is replaced by two bands and the logR ratio is decreased, but to a lesser extent as compared to germline deletions. The various types of somatic deletions are manifested by differences in the position and the size of the two-band patterns. Note that (E) shows a somatic deletion occurring in very few cells. In this situation, detection is easier with use of the BAF (two-band pattern) than with the logR (reduced shift downward). However, the copy number call as a “deletion” relies on a significant decrease of the logR (in this situation, p < 2.2e−16).
(F) Wavy fluctuations of logR ratio, which is not reflected in the BAF, are artefacts. This artifact is responsible for false-positive detection by programs focusing only on logR ratio.
(G) Two small germline duplications are revealed on the BAF plot as heterozygous SNPs showing a two-band pattern with a logR ratio that is increased.
(H) In somatic duplication, the two bands are closer to one another and the increase in logR is less than that of germline amplification (G). As with (E), for (H), the BAF two-band pattern is easier to detect than is the logR shift upward. However, the copy number call as an “amplification” relies on a significant increase of the logR (in this case, p < 2.2e−16). SOMATICs can detect and differentiate the various types of alterations when other programs cannot.