Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1204-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00834.x. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

Evaluating health care programs by combining cost with quality of life measures: a case study comparing capitation and fee for service.

Author information

  • 1Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St., London WC1E7HT, UK. Richard.Grieve@lshtm.ac.ok

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To demonstrate cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) for evaluating different reimbursement models.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING:

The CEA used an observational study comparing fee for service (FFS) versus capitation for Medicaid cases with severe mental illness (n=522). Under capitation, services were provided either directly (direct capitation [DC]) by not-for-profit community mental health centers (CMHC), or in a joint venture between CMHCs and a for-profit managed behavioral health organization (MBHO).

STUDY DESIGN:

A nonparametric matching method (genetic matching) was used to identify those cases that minimized baseline differences across the groups. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were reported for each group. Incremental QALYs were valued at different thresholds for a QALY gained, and combined with cost estimates to plot cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:

QALYs were similar across reimbursement models. Compared with FFS, the MBHO model had incremental costs of -$1,991 and the probability that this model was cost-effective exceeded 0.90. The DC model had incremental costs of $4,694; the probability that this model was cost-effective compared with FFS was <0.10.

CONCLUSIONS:

A capitation model with a for-profit element was more cost-effective for Medicaid patients with severe mental illness than not-for-profit capitation or FFS models.

PMID:
18355261
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2517267
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

Figure 1
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing Icon for PubMed Central
    Write to the Help Desk