Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Appl Opt. 1999 Feb 20;38(6):916-23.

Retrieval of atmospheric profiles from satellite sounder measurements by use of the discrepancy principle.

Author information

  • 1Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, Space Science and Engineering Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1612, USA. JunL@ssec.wisc.edu

Abstract

It is known that an infrared or a microwave remote-sensing equation is an integral equation of the first kind. As a result, it is ill-posed, the solution is unstable, and difficulties arise in its retrieval. To make the solution stable, either an a priori error covariance matrix or a smoothing factor gamma is necessary as a constraint. However, if the error covariance matrix is not known or if it is estimated incorrectly, the solution will be suboptimal. The smoothing factor gamma depends greatly on the observations, the observation error, the spectral coverage of channels, and the initial state or the first guess of the atmospheric profile. It is difficult to determine this factor properly during the retrieval procedure, so the factor is usually chosen empirically. We have developed a discrepancy principle (DP) to determine the gamma in an objective way. An approach is formulated for achieving an optimal solution for the atmospheric profile together with the gamma from satellite sounder observations. The DP method was applied to actual Geostationary Operational Environment Satellite (GOES-8) sounder data at the Southern Great Plains Cloud and Radiation Testbed site. Results show that the DP method yields a 21.7% improvement for low-level temperature and a 23.9% improvement for total precipitable water (TPW) retrievals compared with the traditional minimum-information method. The DP method is also compared with the Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm used in current operational GOES data processing. Results of the comparison show significant improvement, 6.5% for TPW and 11% for low-level water-vapor retrievals, in results obtained with the DP method compared with the Marquardt-Levenberg approach.

PMID:
18305691
[PubMed]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk