The aim of this study was to compare the tumor uptake versus time and the tumor response in nude mice transplanted with a human midgut carcinoid (GOT1), when treated with either [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotide or [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate and to evaluate if plasma chromogranin A (P-CgA) was a reliable marker of tumor response. The tumor uptake and retention of activity of a single intravenous (i.v.) dose (15 MBq) of [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate or [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotide were compared in nude mice xenografted with GOT1. The activity concentration 24 hours after injection was significantly higher in animals given [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate versus [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotide (16%+/-1.4% of injected activity per gram [%IA/g] vs. 8.1%+/-2.1% IA/g, mean +/- standard error of the mean) (p=0.00061). The mean absorbed dose was higher in animals given [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate (46+/-4.3 vs. 17 +/- 3.4 Gy). The reduction of tumor volume was accordingly more prominent in animals given [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate than in animals given [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotide (p=0.003). The mean tumor volume for animals given [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]-octreotate was reduced to 3% of its initial value. P-CgA values were strongly correlated with tumor volume. Octreotate seems to be a more suitable somatostatin analog than octreotide for receptor-mediated radiation therapy. P-CgA is a simple, accurate method for the estimation of tumor response in this animal model.