Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Aug;19(8):1097-101. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0575-1. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

Validity and reproducibility of the digital detection of levator trauma.

Author information

  • 1Nepean Clinical School, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales 2750, Australia. hpdietz@bigpond.com

Erratum in

  • Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Nov;19(11):1589.

Abstract

Levator ani muscle trauma is a common consequence of vaginal childbirth and detectable on digital vaginal palpation. To ascertain validity and reproducibility of this test, we saw 110 women for an interview, prolapse staging, digital vaginal palpation by two blinded examiners and four-dimensional translabial ultrasound. The mean age was 55.5 years (range 17-85) and the median parity was 2 (range 0-8). Three patients could not be assessed, leaving 107 datasets representing 214 assessments of a right or left puborectalis muscle. Levator defects were found in 21 women (20%) with nine bilateral defects. There was agreement between assessors in 173/214 (81%), k=0.411, signifying moderate agreement. Agreement with an independent blinded review of tomographic ultrasound data was k=0.495. Even after substantial training, the agreement between assessors using digital palpation for the diagnosis of levator trauma remains only moderate. There seems to be a substantial learning curve. Palpatory detection of major levator trauma is less repeatable than identification by ultrasound.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk