Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Mar;127(3):623-35. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.004. Epub 2008 Feb 1.

Individual differences in the suppression of unwanted memories: the executive deficit hypothesis.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology, 1227 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1227, USA. blevy@uoregon.edu

Abstract

When confronted with reminders to an unpleasant memory, people often try to prevent the unwanted memory from coming to mind. In this article, we review behavioral and neurocognitive evidence concerning the consequences of exerting such control over memory retrieval. This work indicates that suppressing retrieval is accomplished by control mechanisms that inhibit the unwanted memories, making them harder to recall later, even when desired. This process engages executive control mechanisms mediated by the lateral prefrontal cortex to terminate recollection-related activity in the hippocampus. Together, these findings specify a neurocognitive model of how memory control operates, suggesting that executive control may be an important means of down-regulating intrusive memories over time. We conclude by proposing that individual differences in the regulation of intrusive memories in the aftermath of trauma may be mediated by pre-existing differences in executive control ability. In support of this executive deficit hypothesis, we review the recent work indicating links between executive control ability and memory suppression.

PMID:
18242571
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk