Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Neurology. 2008 Jan 29;70(5):384-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000280469.17461.94.

Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research.

Author information

  • 1Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA, USA. jilles@interchange.ubc.ca

Abstract

A decade of empirical work in brain imaging, genomics, and other areas of research has yielded new knowledge about the frequency of incidental findings, investigator responsibility, and risks and benefits of disclosure. Straightforward guidance for handling such findings of possible clinical significance, however, has been elusive. In early work focusing on imaging studies of the brain, we suggested that investigators and institutional review boards must anticipate and articulate plans for handling incidental findings. Here we provide a detailed analysis of different approaches to the problem and evaluate their merits in the context of the goals and setting of the research and the involvement of neurologists, radiologists, and other physicians. Protecting subject welfare and privacy, as well as ensuring scientific integrity, are the highest priorities in making choices about how to handle incidental findings. Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting.

PMID:
18227420
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2605078
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

Figure
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk