Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2008 Jan;41(1):29-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-993213.

Determinants of voluntary vs. involuntary admission in bipolar disorder and the impact of adherence.

Author information

  • 1Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. daniel.schuepbach@puk.zh.ch

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Treatment adherence plays a pivotal role in hospitalisation in bipolar disorder (BD). We examined the impact of adherence and pharmacological variables on involuntary vs. voluntary admission on a sample of inpatients from the European Mania in Bipolar Longitudinal Evaluation of Medication study (EMBLEM).

METHODS:

1374 inpatients with an acute manic or mixed episode of BD participated in this observational study on clinical, functional and economic outcomes of pharmacological treatment. We analysed data at the time of study inclusion, and the primary outcome measure was admission status (voluntary vs. involuntary admission).

RESULTS:

The strongest baseline factor of admission status was adherence whereby patients' adherence was significantly associated with admission when treated with atypical antipsychotics or lithium as monotherapy. Adherence with typical antipsychotics was not significantly associated with admission status.

DISCUSSION:

These results emphasise the crucial role of treatment adherence for admission status and, within the context of a naturalistic study, some advantage of atypical over typical antipsychotics on admission in acute mania of BD.

PMID:
18203049
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk