Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008 Apr-May;25(2):112-20. Epub 2008 Jan 15.

    To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support.

    Source

    Pritzker School of Medicine, Universtiy of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. fcurlin@uchicago.edu

    Abstract

    This study analyzes data from a national survey to estimate the proportion of physicians who currently object to physician-assisted suicide (PAS), terminal sedation (TS), and withdrawal of artificial life support (WLS), and to examine associations between such objections and physician ethnicity, religious characteristics, and experience caring for dying patients. Overall, 69% of the US physicians object to PAS, 18% to TS, and 5% to WLS. Highly religious physicians are more likely than those with low religiosity to object to both PAS (84% vs 55%, P < .001) and TS (25% vs 12%, P < .001). Objection to PAS or TS is also associated with being of Asian ethnicity, of Hindu religious affiliation, and having more experience caring for dying patients. These findings suggest that, with respect to morally contested interventions at the end of life, the medical care patients receive will vary based on their physicians' religious characteristics, ethnicity, and experience caring for dying patients.

    PMID:
    18198363
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2867462
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (1) Free text

    Figure 1

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk