Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):381-98. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.381.

The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis.

Author information

  • 1Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203-5701, USA. david.cole@vanderbilt.edu

Abstract

In practice, the inclusion of correlated residuals in latent-variable models is often regarded as a statistical sleight of hand, if not an outright form of cheating. Consequently, researchers have tended to allow only as many correlated residuals in their models as are needed to obtain a good fit to the data. The current article demonstrates that this strategy leads to the underinclusion of residual correlations that are completely justified on the basis of measurement theory and research design. In many designs, the absence of such correlations will not substantially harm the fit of the model; however, failure to include them can change the meaning of the extracted latent variables and generate potentially misleading results. Recommendations include (a) returning to the full multitrait-multimethod design when measurement theory implies the existence of shared method variance and (b) abandoning the evil-but-necessary attitude toward correlated residuals when they reflect intended features of the research design.

Copyright (c) 2008 APA.

PMID:
18179350
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for American Psychological Association
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk