PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 3;5(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004.

In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.

Source

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. guyatt@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

BACKGROUND TO THE DEBATE: Systematic reviews that combine high-quality evidence from several trials are now widely considered to be at the top of the hierarchy of clinical evidence. Given the primacy of systematic reviews-and the fact that individual clinical trials rarely provide definitive answers to a clinical research question-some commentators question whether the sample size calculation for an individual trial still matters. Others point out that small trials can still be potentially misleading.

PMID:: 18177203; [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:: PMC2174963

Free PMC Article

MeSH Terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Clinical Trials - MedlinePlus Health Information

Miscellaneous

NCI CPTC Antibody Characterization Program

Supplemental Content

Save items

PubReader: A whole new way to read scientific literature at PubMed Central.

Related citations in PubMed

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies. [Pain Physician. 2009]
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L, Datta S, Smith HS, Hirsch JA. Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct; 12(5):819-50.
Review Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. [Pain Med. 2008]
Review Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
Chou R. Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug; 9(5):518-30.
Review Systematic reviews as a tool for planning and interpreting trials. [Int J Stroke. 2009]
Review Systematic reviews as a tool for planning and interpreting trials.
Bath PM, Gray LJ. Int J Stroke. 2009 Feb; 4(1):23-7.
A simple method to correct for the design effect in systematic reviews of trials using paired dichotomous data. [J Clin Epidemiol. 2007]
A simple method to correct for the design effect in systematic reviews of trials using paired dichotomous data.
Perera R, Glasziou P. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep; 60(9):975-8. Epub 2007 May 4.
Review Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials. [Pain Physician. 2008]
Review Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 2: Randomized controlled trials.
Manchikanti L, Hirsch JA, Smith HS. Pain Physician. 2008 Nov-Dec; 11(6):717-73.

See reviews... See all...

Cited by 11 PubMed Central articles

The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews. [PLoS One. 2013]
The impact of study size on meta-analyses: examination of underpowered studies in Cochrane reviews.
Turner RM, Bird SM, Higgins JP. PLoS One. 2013; 8(3):e59202. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
Effect of selenium supplementation on CD4 T-cell recovery, viral suppression, morbidity and quality of life of HIV-infected patients in Rwanda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. [Trials. 2011]
Effect of selenium supplementation on CD4 T-cell recovery, viral suppression, morbidity and quality of life of HIV-infected patients in Rwanda: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Kamwesiga J, Mutabazi V, Kayumba J, Tayari JC, Smyth R, Fay H, Umurerwa A, Baziruwiha M, Ntizimira C, Murebwayire A, et al. Trials. 2011 Aug 13; 12:192. Epub 2011 Aug 13.
Escitalopram and neuroendocrine response in healthy first-degree relatives to depressed patients--a randomized placebo-controlled trial. [PLoS One. 2011]
Escitalopram and neuroendocrine response in healthy first-degree relatives to depressed patients--a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
Knorr U, Vinberg M, Hansen A, Klose M, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hilsted L, Hasselstrøm J, Gether U, Winkel P, Gluud C, et al. PLoS One. 2011; 6(6):e21224. Epub 2011 Jun 27.

See all...

Related information

Related Citations
Calculated set of PubMed citations closely related to the selected article(s) retrieved using a word weight algorithm. Related articles are displayed in ranked order from most to least relevant, with the “linked from” citation displayed first.
References for this PMC Article
Citation referenced in PubMed article. Only valid for PubMed citations that are also in PMC.
Free in PMC
Free full text articles in PMC
Cited in PMC
Full-text articles in the PubMed Central Database that cite the current articles.

Recent activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still mat...
In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 3 ;5(1):e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050004.

PubMed

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

PubMed

Result Filters

Display Settings:

Send to:

In the era of systematic reviews, does the size of an individual trial still matter.

Source

Abstract

MeSH Terms

MeSH Terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Miscellaneous

Supplemental Content

Save items

Related citations in PubMed

Cited by 11 PubMed Central articles

Related information

Recent activity

Simple NCBI Directory

Getting Started

Resources

Popular

Featured

NCBI Information