Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Ann Intern Med. 2007 Dec 18;147(12):840-53.

    Meta-analysis: vitamin D compounds in chronic kidney disease.

    Palmer SC, McGregor DO, Macaskill P, Craig JC, Elder GJ, Strippoli GF.

    Department of Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Christchurch, New Zealand. strippoli@negrisud.it

    Comment in:

    BACKGROUND: Vitamin D compounds are widely used to prevent and treat secondary hyperparathyroidism. PURPOSE: To determine whether vitamin D therapy improves biochemical markers of mineral metabolism and cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in chronic kidney disease. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2007), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2007), and Cochrane databases were searched without language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials of vitamin D compounds in chronic kidney disease were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently extracted data. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seventy-six trials were identified for inclusion; 3667 participants were enrolled. Vitamin D compounds did not reduce the risk for death, bone pain, vascular calcification, or parathyroidectomy. Compared with placebo, established vitamin D sterols were associated with an increased risk for hypercalcemia (relative risk, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.16 to 4.85]) and hyperphosphatemia (relative risk, 1.77 [CI, 1.15 to 2.74]) but did not show a consistent reduction in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. Compared with placebo, more recently developed vitamin D analogues were associated with hypercalcemia (relative risk, 5.15 [CI, 1.06 to 24.97]) but not hyperphosphatemia, and levels of PTH were reduced (weighted mean difference, -10.77 pmol/L [CI, -20.51 to -1.03 pmol/L]). For suppression of PTH, intravenous administration was superior to oral vitamin D, but higher intravenous doses were used. LIMITATIONS: Few studies reported patient-level outcomes, including mortality (8 of 76 trials), and only 5 trials directly compared the effects of treatment with newer vitamin D compounds versus established ones. Heterogeneity in some comparisons remained unexplained by metaregression analyses. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D compounds do not consistently reduce PTH levels, and beneficial effects on patient-level outcomes are unproven. The value of vitamin D treatment for people with chronic kidney disease remains uncertain.

    PMID: 18087055 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read