Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Health Educ Behav. 2009 Apr;36(2):394-409. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

    Heart disease management by women: does intervention format matter?

    Source

    University of Michigan, Center for Managing Chronic Disease, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. mclark@umich.edu

    Abstract

    A randomized controlled trial of two formats of a program (Women Take PRIDE) to enhance management of heart disease by patients was conducted. Older women (N = 575) were randomly assigned to a group or self-directed format or to a control group. Data regarding symptoms, functional health status, and weight were collected at baseline and at 4, 12, and 18 months. The formats produced different outcomes. At 18 months, the self-directed format was better than the control in reducing the number (p < or = .02), frequency (p < or = .03), and bothersomeness (p < or = .02) of cardiac symptoms. The self-directed format was also better than the group format in reducing symptom frequency of all types (p < or = .04). The group format improved ambulation at 12 months (p < or = .04) and weight loss at 18 months (p < or = .03), and group participants were more likely to complete the program ( p < or = .05). The availability of different learning formats could enhance management of cardiovascular disease by patients.

    PMID:
    18084052
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC3331992
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (1) Free text

    Figure 1

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk