Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jan 15;24(2):243-9. Epub 2007 Dec 1.

Déjà vu--a study of duplicate citations in Medline.

Author information

  • 1UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas TX 75390-9185, USA.

Abstract

MOTIVATION:

Duplicate publication impacts the quality of the scientific corpus, has been difficult to detect, and studies this far have been limited in scope and size. Using text similarity searches, we were able to identify signatures of duplicate citations among a body of abstracts.

RESULTS:

A sample of 62,213 Medline citations was examined and a database of manually verified duplicate citations was created to study author publication behavior. We found that 0.04% of the citations with no shared authors were highly similar and are thus potential cases of plagiarism. 1.35% with shared authors were sufficiently similar to be considered a duplicate. Extrapolating, this would correspond to 3500 and 117,500 duplicate citations in total, respectively.

AVAILABILITY:

eTBLAST, an automated citation matching tool, and Déjà vu, the duplicate citation database, are freely available at http://invention.swmed.edu/ and http://spore.swmed.edu/dejavu

PMID:
18056062
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk