Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2007 Aug;50:s7-14.

Symptom rating scales and outcome in schizophrenia.

Author information

  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Hull. a.m.mortimer@hull.ac.uk

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Symptom rating scales are now well established in schizophrenia research but their scores are not the same as outcome.

AIMS:

To appraise the usefulness of symptom rating scales in evaluating the outcome of people with schizophrenia.

METHOD:

Literature on the use of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) in schizophrenia research was studied.

RESULTS:

Scales were designed to make diagnoses, to categorise patients, syndromes or both, and to demonstrate antipsychotic efficacy, as well as to measure outcome. There is much redundancy both between and within scales. Early work suggests limited concurrent validity with external outcome variables. Data are at best ordinal and there are particular difficulties in equating outcome with percentage changes in scores. The concept of remission, which uses absolute item score thresholds with a duration criterion, is a promising outcome measure.

CONCLUSIONS:

Symptom rating scale scores can only comprise a limited part of outcome measurement. Standardised remission criteria may present advantages in outcome research.

PMID:
18019038
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk