Analysis of mutations affecting stability of the Pam16:Pam18 heterodimer. (A) Growth phenotypes. Tenfold serial dilutions of wt, pam18L150W, and pam16L97W cells were spotted onto rich glucose-based media, followed by incubation at the indicated temperatures for 2 d. (B) Interaction of purified Pam16 and Pam18. Purified proteins (3.1 μM) were incubated together for 30 min at 23°C: wt Pam18 (18), wt Pam16 (16), Pam16L97W (16L/W), or Pam18L150W, (18L/W). CoIPs was carried out using Pam18- and Pam16-specific antibodies. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie Blue. Samples containing 100% of the input served as a control for immunoprecipitation efficiency (bottom). Controls (C) were Pam18 (C1), Pam18L150W (C2), Pam16 (C3), and Pam16L97W (C4). (C and D) In organellar analysis of Pam18 and Pam16. wt, pam18L150W (18LW), or pam16L97W (16LW). (C) Mitochondria were incubated in 1% Triton X-100 and then subjected to immunoprecipitation by using Pam18- and Pam16-specific antibodies, as indicated by brackets, followed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting by using Pam18 and Pam-specific antibodies. Fifty percent of soluble material after lysis was used as a loading control (50% input). (D) Coimmunoprecipitation of the Pam18:Pam16 complex with the core Tim23 translocon complex. Mitochondria were solubilized with buffer containing 1% digitonin, and the supernatants were subjected to immunoprecipitation using Tim23-specific antibodies. The samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted against Tim23-, Tim50-, Tim44-, Tim17-, Pam16- and Pam18-specific antibodies. Twenty-five percent of total soluble material after lysis was used as a loading control (25% input).