Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Nov;136(4):623-38.

Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks.

Author information

  • 1Visual Attention Lab, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, Massachusetts 021139-4170, USA. wolfe@search.bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

In visual search tasks, observers look for targets in displays containing distractors. Likelihood that targets will be missed varies with target prevalence, the frequency with which targets are presented across trials. Miss error rates are much higher at low target prevalence (1%-2%) than at high prevalence (50%). Unfortunately, low prevalence is characteristic of important search tasks such as airport security and medical screening where miss errors are dangerous. A series of experiments show this prevalence effect is very robust. In signal detection terms, the prevalence effect can be explained as a criterion shift and not a change in sensitivity. Several efforts to induce observers to adopt a better criterion fail. However, a regime of brief retraining periods with high prevalence and full feedback allows observers to hold a good criterion during periods of low prevalence with no feedback.

2007 APA

PMID:
17999575
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2662480
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (19)Free text

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for American Psychological Association Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk