Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Br J Anaesth. 2008 Jan;100(1):50-4. Epub 2007 Nov 3.

Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or sevoflurane anaesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery.

Author information

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine 135-710, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-ku, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is often affected by intra-nasal bleeding, which can be influenced by various anaesthetics and preoperative conditions. This study compared the surgical condition and the amount of intra-nasal bleeding between patients given sevoflurane/remifentanil (SR) and propofol/remifentanil (PR) anaesthesia.

METHODS:

ASA I or II patients undergoing ESS were randomly assigned to group SR (n=20) or group PR (n=20). The extent of the preoperative surgical lesion was classified as high (> 12) and low Lund-Mackay (LM) (< or = 12) scores according to the computed tomography findings. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was calculated from the patients' haemoglobin (Hb) and the amount of blood in the suction canister. The surgeons rated the visibility of the surgical field on a numeric rating scale (NRS).

RESULTS:

In the high-LM score patients, the median (1st/3rd quartiles) blood loss for the SR and PR groups was 135 (121/222) and 19 (8/71) ml h(-1), respectively (P<0.01), and the mean (SD) of NRS was 5.8 (2.3) and 2.3 (1.0), respectively (P<0.05). However, in patients with low-LM score, both blood loss and NRS scores were not different between groups SR and PR.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the high-LM score patients, PR anaesthesia results in less blood loss and a better surgical conditions for ESS than SR anaesthesia.

PMID:
17982167
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk