Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access:...[Am J Surg. 2007] - PubMed Result

SearchDatabase nameforSearch term

Advanced Search

Your browser version may not work well with NCBI's Web applications. More information here...

Display Show

All: 1

Review: 0

Click to change filter selection through MyNCBI.

1: Am J Surg. 2007 Nov;194(5):699. Links

Comment on:: Am J Surg. 2006 Jul;192(1):63-7.

Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.

Sarveswaran J, Burke D, Bodenham A.

PMID: 17936440 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

Related articles

Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.
Am J Surg. 2006 Jul; 192(1):63-7.

[Am J Surg. 2006]
Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications.
Arch Surg. 2001 Sep; 136(9):1050-3.

[Arch Surg. 2001]
External jugular vein cutdown approach, as a useful alternative, supports the choice of the cephalic vein for totally implantable access device placement.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul; 12(7):570-3. Epub 2005 May 5.

[Ann Surg Oncol. 2005]
ReviewVascular access techniques and devices in the pediatric patient.
Surg Clin North Am. 1992 Dec; 72(6):1267-84.

[Surg Clin North Am. 1992]
ReviewPeripheral vascular cutdown.
Crit Care Clin. 1992 Oct; 8(4):807-18.

[Crit Care Clin. 1992]
» See reviews... | » See all...

Recent Activity

Clear Turn Off Turn On

Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications ...Cephalic vein cut-down verses percutaneous access: a retrospective study of complications of implantable venous access devices.

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

Display Show