Cellular binding partners of ESCRT-I and ALIX. (A) Proteomic identification of ESCRT-I and ALIX binding partners. Upper panel: summarized data from yeast two-hybrid screens of AD prey libraries for DBD-TSG101 and DBD-ALIX binding partners. Binding sites were inferred from the minimal overlapping regions of bait and prey fragments that gave positive interactions. Lower panel: proteins identified as ESCRT-I or ALIX binding partners in affinity purification/mass spectrometric experiments (and absent in control purifications). Bait proteins were expressed as One-STrEP-FLAG (OSF, N-terminal) or FLAG-One-STrEP (FOS, C-terminal) fusions, and OSF-TSG101 was coexpressed with untagged versions of other ESCRT-I subunits (VPS28 and VPS37A-D) in samples labeled ‘TSG101/ESCRT-I'. (B) Cytokinesis proteins co-precipitate with ALIX and ESCRT-I. ‘Bait' FLAG-ALIX and OSF-TSG101 or empty vector controls were tested for co-precipitation with overexpressed Myc-tagged ‘prey' proteins or with endogenous IQGAP1 (lower right). Western blots show (1) prey protein levels in soluble lysates (middle panels, Lysate, IB: anti-Myc), (2) bait proteins bound to anti-FLAG (FLAG-ALIX) or StrepTactin (OSF-TSG/ESCRT-I) matrices (lower panels, IP: anti-FLAG or Strep), or (3) prey proteins co-precipitated onto the matrix (upper panels, IB: anti-Myc or anti-IQGAP1). Note that untagged versions of the three other ESCRT-I subunits (VPS37B, MVB12A, and VPS28) were always coexpressed with OSF-TSG101, and that others have also reported TSG101-CEP55, ALIX-CEP55, and ALIX-CD2AP interactions (Sakai et al, 2006; Usami et al, 2007). (C) Yeast two-hybrid mapping of the TSG101 binding sites for IQGAP11463–1547. TSG101-AD fusions (rows 2–6) or control AD constructs (row 1, Empty) were coexpressed together with IQGAP11463–1547-DBD (column 2) or control DBD constructs (column 1, Empty) and tested for positive yeast two-hybrid interactions (left) or co-transformation (control, right). Note that IQGAP11463-1547 shows positive interactions with both the stalk and head regions of TSG101. (D) Yeast two-hybrid mapping of the TSG101 binding sites for ROCK1. The experiment is analogous to that in panel C, except that TSG101 constructs were expressed as DBD fusions and ROCK1 was expressed as an AD fusion. Note that ROCK1 shows positive interactions with both the stalk and core regions of TSG101. (E) Summary of TSG101 interactions with IQGAP1 and ROCK1. Domain abbreviations: CH, Calponin Homology; IR, IQGAP-Specific Repeat; GRD, GAP-Related Domain; UEV, Ubiquitin E2 Variant; PRR, Proline-Rich Region; Coil, predicted coiled-coil region; RB, Rho-Binding region; Zn, Zinc finger; PH, Plexstrin Homology Domain.