Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Biochem. 2007 Nov;40(16-17):1305-10. Epub 2007 Aug 11.

A comparison of automated methods for the quantitation of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.

Author information

  • 1Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Ontario, Canada. samantha.kimball@utoronto.ca

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare automated platforms with the routinely used methods in our clinical laboratory for the quantitation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D].

METHOD:

The NEXgen Four and Triturus ELISA platforms, utilizing the IDS enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit for 25(OH)D, and the DiaSorin Liaison 25(OH)D methods were compared with the DiaSorin radio immunoassay (RIA) kit. The NEXgen Four and the Triturus, utilizing IDS EIA for 1,25(OH)2D, were compared with the thymus radioreceptor assay (RRA) for measurement of 1,25(OH)2D.

RESULTS:

NEXgen correlated best with DiaSorin RIA (r(2)=0.652). NEXgen correlated best with the thymus RRA method (r(2)=0.541). Imprecision CV values for NEXgen 1,25(OH)2D were 2.8-9.4% within-run and 10.2-13.9% between-run compared with a between-run precision of 14.0-16.9% with the thymus RRA method.

CONCLUSION:

NEXgen correlated best with DiaSorin RIA for measurement of 25(OH)D. NEXgen correlated best and demonstrated better precision than thymus RRA for quantitation of 1,25(OH)2D.

PMID:
17825808
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk