Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Med Decis Making. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(4):380-6.

    Improving the decision to pursue a phase 3 clinical trial by adjusting for patient-specific factors in evaluating phase 2 treatment efficacy data.

    Source

    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. hellerg@mskcc.org

    Abstract

    Phase 2 clinical trials are undertaken to provide evidence of treatment efficacy and safety. A test statistic that accounts for individual patient risk in the patient population is proposed and applied to a phase 2 clinical trial for castrate metastatic prostate cancer. The test statistic is computed to compare, for each patient, the observed 2-year survival outcome to the predicted 2-year survival probability. A logistic regression model, developed using historical data in the same patient population, is used to adjust for patient risk in predicting the 2-year survival probability. Goodness-of-fit procedures are performed to ensure that a proper model is fit to the data. The test result is compared to the score test, the binomial exact test, and Fisher's exact test, all of which use the average 2-year survival probability in the population as the parameter of interest. The results demonstrate the benefit of risk adjustment in determining treatment efficacy in a single-arm phase 2 trial. By adjusting for patient risk, this method can provide a more precise assessment of phase 2 treatment efficacy, thereby improving the decision whether to proceed to a phase 3 clinical trial.

    PMID:
    17761958
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Press

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk