Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep;11(9):393-9. Epub 2007 Aug 16.

    How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.

    Source

    Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA. gclore@virginia.edu

    Abstract

    Being happy or sad influences the content and style of thought. One explanation is that affect serves as information about the value of whatever comes to mind. Thus, when a person makes evaluative judgments or engages in a task, positive affect can enhance evaluations and empower potential responses. Rather than affect itself, the information conveyed by affect is crucial. Tests of the hypothesis find that affective influences can be made to disappear by changing the source to which the affect is attributed. In tasks, positive affect validates and negative affect invalidates accessible cognitions, leading to relational processing and item-specific processing, respectively. Positive affect is found to promote, and negative affect to inhibit, many textbook phenomena from cognitive psychology.

    PMID:
    17698405
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC2483304
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (3)Free text

    Figure 1
    Figure 2
    Figure 3

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk