Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Aug;81(2):208-27. Epub 2007 Jul 3.

    A Bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies.

    Source

    Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. jonno@u.washington.edu

    Erratum in

    • Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Sep;83(3):424.

    Abstract

    In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probability (FPRP) but uses more information, has a noteworthy threshold defined naturally in terms of the costs of false discovery and nondiscovery, and has a sound methodological foundation. In addition, in a multiple-testing situation, it is straightforward to estimate the expected numbers of false discoveries and false nondiscoveries. We provide an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical behavior of these measures, along with BFDP, via simulation. Finally, we use BFDP to assess the association between 131 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and lung cancer in a case-control study.

    PMID:
    17668372
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1950810
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (9) Free text

    Figure  1. 
    Figure  3. 
    Figure  5. 
    Figure  7. 
    Figure  B1. 
    Figure  2. 
    Figure  4. 
    Figure  6. 
    Figure  8. 

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk