Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
BMJ. 2007 Jul 7;335(7609):28. Epub 2007 May 21.

Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.

Author information

  • 1Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Centre for Cancer Prevention, Via S Francesco da Paola 31 10123 Turin, Italy. guglielmo.ronco@cpo.it

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the accuracy of conventional cytology with liquid based cytology for primary screening of cervical cancer.

DESIGN:

Randomised controlled trial.

SETTING:

Nine screening programmes in Italy.

PARTICIPANTS:

Women aged 25-60 attending for a new screening round: 22 466 were assigned to the conventional arm and 22 708 were assigned to the experimental arm.

INTERVENTIONS:

Conventional cytology compared with liquid based cytology and testing for human papillomavirus.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:

Relative sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more at blindly reviewed histology, with atypical cells of undetermined significance or more severe cytology considered a positive result.

RESULTS:

In an intention to screen analysis liquid based cytology showed no significant increase in sensitivity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more (relative sensitivity 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.56) whereas the positive predictive value was reduced (relative positive predictive value v conventional cytology 0.58, 0.44 to 0.77). Liquid based cytology detected more lesions of grade 1 or more (relative sensitivity 1.68, 1.40 to 2.02), with a larger increase among women aged 25-34 (P for heterogeneity 0.0006), but did not detect more lesions of grade 3 or more (relative sensitivity 0.84, 0.56 to 1.25). Results were similar when only low grade intraepithelial lesions or more severe cytology were considered a positive result. No evidence was found of heterogeneity between centres or of improvement with increasing time from start of the study. The relative frequency of women with at least one unsatisfactory result was lower with liquid based cytology (0.62, 0.56 to 0.69).

CONCLUSION:

Liquid based cytology showed no statistically significant difference in sensitivity to conventional cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more. More positive results were found, however, leading to a lower positive predictive value. A large reduction in unsatisfactory smears was evident.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN81678807 [controlled-trials.com].

Comment in

PMID:
17517761
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1910655
Free PMC Article

Images from this publication.See all images (1)Free text

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk