Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
    Nucl Med Biol. 2007 May;34(4):405-13. Epub 2007 Mar 30.

    Tumor resection cavity administered iodine-131-labeled antitenascin 81C6 radioimmunotherapy in patients with malignant glioma: neuropathology aspects.

    Source

    Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. mclen001@mc.duke.edu

    Abstract

    INTRODUCTION:

    The neurohistological findings in patients treated with targeted beta emitters such as (131)I are poorly described. We report a histopathologic analysis from patients treated with combined external beam therapy and a brachytherapy consisting of a (131)I-labeled monoclonal antibody (mAb) injected into surgically created resection cavities during brain tumor resections.

    METHODS:

    Directed tissue samples of the cavity walls were obtained because of suspected tumor recurrence from 28 patients. Samples and clinical follow-up were evaluated on all patients (Group A) based on total radiation dose received and a subset of these (n=18; Group B, proximal therapy subset) who had received external beam therapy within <or=3 months of mAb therapy and undergoing 26 biopsies over 37 months. Histologic outcomes were "proliferative glioma," "quiescent glioma" and negative for neoplasm. Statistical analysis was used to assess the casual relation between total absorbed dose ((131)I-mAb+external beam) and histologic diagnosis.

    RESULTS:

    The lesions observed after (131)I-mAb therapy were qualitatively similar to those reported for other types of radiation therapy; however, the high localized dose rate and absorbed doses produced by the short range of (131)I beta particles seem to have resulted in an earlier necrotic reaction in the tumor bed. Among all 28 (Group A) patients, median survival from tissue analysis after mAb therapy depended on histopathology and total radiation absorbed dose. Median survival for patients with tissue classified as proliferative glioma, quiescent glioma and negative for neoplasm were 3.5, 15 and 27.5 months, respectively. Without categorization, total dose was a significant predictor of survival (P<.002) where patients with higher doses had better prognoses. For example, median survival in patients receiving a total radiation dose greater than 86 Gy was 19 months compared with 7 months for those receiving less than 86 Gy.

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Histopathologic analysis correlated with prognosis. Among all patients (Group A) there was a significant correlation between biopsy outcome, survival, and total radiation absorbed dose. Among the Group B proximal therapy patients, the neuropathologic changes were qualitatively similar to those described for external beam therapy and interstitial brachytherapy.

    PMID:
    17499730
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1952684
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (7) Free text

    Figure 2
    Figure 4
    Figure 6
    Figure 1
    Figure 3
    Figure 5
    Figure 7

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      loading

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk