Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 15;104 Suppl 1:8669-76. Epub 2007 May 9.

    Biological design in science classrooms.

    Source

    National Center for Science Education, Inc., 420 40th Street #2, Oakland, CA 94609-2509, USA. scott@ncseweb.org

    Abstract

    Although evolutionary biology is replete with explanations for complex biological structures, scientists concerned about evolution education have been forced to confront "intelligent design" (ID), which rejects a natural origin for biological complexity. The content of ID is a subset of the claims made by the older "creation science" movement. Both creationist views contend that highly complex biological adaptations and even organisms categorically cannot result from natural causes but require a supernatural creative agent. Historically, ID arose from efforts to produce a form of creationism that would be less vulnerable to legal challenges and that would not overtly rely upon biblical literalism. Scientists do not use ID to explain nature, but because it has support from outside the scientific community, ID is nonetheless contributing substantially to a long-standing assault on the integrity of science education.

    PMID:
    17494747
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1876445
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (2)Free text

    Fig. 1.
    Fig. 2.

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk