Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 May;33(5):603-14. Epub 2007 Apr 17.

Revisiting the Stanford prison experiment: could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty?

Author information

  • 1Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, USA.

Erratum in

  • Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Jun;33(6):911.

Abstract

The authors investigated whether students who selectively volunteer for a study of prison life possess dispositions associated with behaving abusively. Students were recruited for a psychological study of prison life using a virtually identical newspaper ad as used in the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE; Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973) or for a psychological study, an identical ad minus the words of prison life. Volunteers for the prison study scored significantly higher on measures of the abuse-related dispositions of aggressiveness, authoritarianism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and social dominance and lower on empathy and altruism, two qualities inversely related to aggressive abuse. Although implications for the SPE remain a matter of conjecture, an interpretation in terms of person-situation interactionism rather than a strict situationist account is indicated by these findings. Implications for interpreting the abusiveness of American military guards at Abu Ghraib Prison also are discussed.

Comment in

PMID:
17440210
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for HighWire
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk