Relative Chlorophyll Levels, Chlase Processing, and Localization in Tobacco Protoplasts Transiently Expressing Citrus Chlase Versions.
(A) Tobacco protoplasts were transiently transformed with plasmids harboring the gene encoding GFP alone (p35S-GFP) or in combination with either full-length Chlase (p35S-Chlase+35S-GFP) or N-terminally deleted Chlase (p35S-ChlaseΔN+35S-GFP).
(B) After 72 h of transient expression, fluorescence was visualized using a laser scanning confocal microscope as described in Methods. One representative protoplast for each construct is visually presented as follows: panel 1, green fluorescence corresponds to GFP; panel 2, red fluorescence corresponds to chlorophyll; panel 3, confocal image recorded simultaneously in transmitted and red fluorescence mode (i.e., chlorophyll fluorescence overlaid on the bright-field image); and panel 4, confocal image recorded simultaneously for red and green fluorescence (i.e., GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence overlaid). Protoplasts displaying similar levels of GFP fluorescence were selected for semiquantitative analysis of chlorophyll relative levels by fluorescence. Average fluorescence measured for protoplasts expressing GFP alone (CAI = 15.55 ± 1.8; n = 3) was designated as 100%. Average fluorescence for protoplasts expressing Chlase with GFP (CAI = 3.6 ± 0.5; n = 3) and protoplasts expressing ChlaseΔN with GFP (CAI = 0.71 ± 0.64; n = 5) are depicted as percentages relative to protoplasts expressing GFP alone.
(C) Analysis of expression and processing kinetics of citrus Chlase versions in protoplasts. Tobacco protoplasts were transiently transformed with plasmids directing coexpression of Chlase and GFP (p35S-Chlase+35S-GFP), coexpression of ChlaseΔN and GFP (p35S-ChlaseΔN+35S-GFP), or GFP alone as a control. Protoplasts were harvested at 24, 48, and 72 h after transformation, and total proteins extracted with USB protein extraction buffer were separated by SDS-PAGE (30 μg per sample), blotted, and dressed with anti-citrus Chlase antibodies for the detection of citrus Chlase versions. Protoplasts expressing GFP alone served as a negative control for citrus Chlase–specific detection.
(D) Intracellular localization of Chlase versions in protoplasts. Tobacco protoplasts transiently transformed with the constructs mentioned above were harvested at 72 h after transformation. Intact chloroplasts were isolated from lysed protoplasts by Percoll gradient centrifugation and were in turn lysed and fractionated to membrane and soluble fractions. Membrane-associated proteins were washed with buffer containing 200 mM NaCl (data not shown) followed by extraction with buffer containing 0.5% Triton X-100. Proteins were precipitated with acetone and resuspended in USB protein extraction buffer from intact protoplasts, intact chloroplasts, chloroplast soluble and membrane fractions, 0.5% Triton X-100 wash of membrane fractions, and membrane pellets after Triton wash. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (loading based on equal chlorophyll: 6 μg per lane), blotted, and dressed with anti-citrus Chlase antibodies for the detection of expressed Chlase versions, anti-LHCII (thylakoid integral membrane protein) antibodies, and anti-OE33 (lumen protein) antibodies for the detection of the endogenous proteins that serve as controls. The GFP control lane contains total protein extract from transformed protoplasts expressing GFP but not expressing any of the citrus Chlase versions.