My NCBISign In

Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):864-72. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

    Randomized comparison of dry dressings versus hydrogel in management of radiation-induced moist desquamation.

    Macmillan MS, Wells M, MacBride S, Raab GM, Munro A, MacDougall H.

    Napier University, Faculty of Life Sciences, Edinburgh, UK. m.macmillan@napier.ac.uk

    Comment in:

    Abstract

    PURPOSE: We present the results of a randomized controlled clinical trial that evaluated the effect of a hydrogel or dry dressing on the time to healing of moist desquamation after radiotherapy to the head-and-neck, breast, or anorectal areas.

    METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 357 patients were randomized before radiotherapy to receive simple dry dressings (Tricotex) or a hydrogel (Intrasite), with Tricotex as a secondary dressing. Patients were instructed to use their dressings from the onset of moist desquamation, if it occurred.

    RESULTS: Of the 357 patients, 100 (28%) developed moist desquamation. The time to healing was significantly prolonged (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.99), in patients assigned to gel dressings. No evidence was found that gel dressings had a significant impact on subjectively reported skin symptoms.

    CONCLUSION: The results of this study have not supported the routine use of hydrogels in the care of patients with moist desquamation and suggests that the healing times are prolonged, without any improvement in patient comfort.

    PMID: 17363185 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]

    Supplemental Content

    Click here to read

    Recent activity

    Your browsing activity is empty.

    Activity recording is turned off.

    Turn recording back on

    See more...
    Write to the Help Desk