Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Aug;31(8):1270-6. Epub 2007 Feb 27.

Comparison of a phone vs clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss.

Author information

  • 1Energy Balance Lab and Center for Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Weight Management, Schiefelbusch Institute for Life Span Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. jdonnelly@ku.edu

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy of a phone vs a traditional face-to-face clinic approach to achieve 10% weight loss and weight maintenance.

DESIGN:

Twenty-six week, randomized, controlled trial.

SUBJECTS:

Twenty-four men and 72 women, ages 25-68 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 33.2+/-3.8.

MEASUREMENTS:

Weight loss at 12 weeks and weight maintenance at 26 weeks were the primary outcomes. Attendance, meal replacements (MRs), fruits/vegetables (F/V), and physical activity (PA) were measured weekly for process evaluation.

RESULTS:

Median weight loss (range) from baseline at 12 weeks was significantly different for phone at 10.6 kg (16.6) or 10.4% and clinic at 12.7 kg (19.9) or 13.7%, and both were significantly different when compared with the control group with a weight loss of 0.25 kg (5.6) or 0.24%. Median weight loss at 26 weeks was 12.8 kg (23.4) or 13.0% from baseline for the phone group and 12.5 kg (35.2) or 12.6% from baseline for the clinic group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The median weight loss for both phone and clinic groups at 12 and 26 weeks exceeded the NHLBI guideline of 10% weight loss from baseline. The phone approach may be a viable option to the traditional weight management clinic for both service providers and participants.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Nature Publishing Group
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk