Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Crit Care. 2007;11(1):111; discussion 111.

Doing research on the ethics of doing research.

Author information

  • Harvard Medical School, Department of Social Medicine, Division of Medical Ethics, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Robert.Truog@childrens.harvard.edu

Abstract

In the previous issue of Critical Care Chenaud and colleagues found that most intensive care unit patients who had given informed consent for their participation in a clinical trial could not recall either the purpose of the trial or its related risks several days later. These findings should remind us that informed consent is a process, not an event, but they should not be interpreted to mean that recall is, of itself, a useful criterion for evaluating either the validity or the quality of the informed consent process. On an entirely separate note, the decision of the authors not to obtain informed consent for this study itself raises interesting questions about the ethics of doing research on the ethics of doing research.

Comment on

PMID:
17316465
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC2151858
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk