Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Feb 15;7:10.

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Author information

  • 1EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. bshea@ciet.org

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus.

METHODS:

A 37-item assessment tool was formed by combining 1) the enhanced Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), 2) a checklist created by Sacks, and 3) three additional items recently judged to be of methodological importance. This tool was applied to 99 paper-based and 52 electronic systematic reviews. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify underlying components. The results were considered by methodological experts using a nominal group technique aimed at item reduction and design of an assessment tool with face and content validity.

RESULTS:

The factor analysis identified 11 components. From each component, one item was selected by the nominal group. The resulting instrument was judged to have face and content validity.

CONCLUSION:

A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed. The tool consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Additional studies are needed with a focus on the reproducibility and construct validity of AMSTAR, before strong recommendations can be made on its use.

PMID:
17302989
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID:
PMC1810543
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk