Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Jun;97(2):138-48. Epub 2007 Feb 9.

What constrains children's learning of novel shape terms?

Author information

  • 1Division of Psychology, School of Biology and Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK. catherine.ohanlon@ncl.ac.uk

Abstract

In this study, 3-year-olds matched on vocabulary score were taught three new shape terms by one of three types of linguistic contrast: corrective, semantic, or referential. A 5-week training paradigm implemented four training sessions and four assessment sessions. Corrective contrast ("This is concave, it is not square," where square is the child's label for the target) produced more learning than did either semantic or referential contrast. In addition, regardless of group, more was learned about those targets that were classified more variably at pretest. Avoidance of lexical overlap (i.e., using more than one term for the same dimension) might make it more difficult for children to learn new dimensional adjectives, and a "shape bias" might make learning shape terms easier. However, children's expectations about the speaker's communicative intent interacted with the potential benefits of contrast in the semantic condition, and children in that group learned no more than did controls.

PMID:
17292387
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Elsevier Science
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk