Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Perspect Biol Med. 2007 Winter;50(1):54-71.

Regulation of financial conflicts of interest in medical practice and medical research: a damaging solution in search of a problem.

Author information

  • Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. tstossel@rics.bwh.harvard.edu

Abstract

The free market, which includes most practicing physicians, publicly supported biomedical researchers, and private drug and device companies, has succeeded spectacularly in delivering new medical technologies to the public. Increased interactions between doctors (physicians and biomedical researchers), epitomized by the founding of the biotechnology revolution, have and can continue to accelerate this delivery. A powerful anti-commercial advocacy movement that has blossomed over the past 20 years threatens this momentum. This movement has succeeded in inverting reality by demonizing the market and by promoting distorted and damaging views of professionalism and of science. Most ominously, it has imposed onerous and counterproductive regulations on medical education and translational research.

PMID:
17259676
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Project MUSE
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk