Partial inhibition of ETC activity has a greater effect on mitochondrial function in stimulated than in resting terminals Simplified equivalent circuit of the mitochondrial inner membrane (A) allows prediction of how the number of H+-extruding complexes affects Ψm depolarization (B) and ETC H+ extrusion (C) in the absence (rest) or presence (stimulated) of Ca2+ influx into motor terminal mitochondria. Partial inhibition of ETC activity (e.g. due to inhibiting complex I) reduces the stimulation-induced increase in H+ extrusion and increases the stimulation-induced depolarization of Ψm. In A, H+ extrusion by respiratory complexes I, III and IV is modelled as current through RETC driven by the battery electromotive force (Emf), where RETC is the resistance of all proton-extruding complexes arranged in parallel. H+ current into the matrix via H+ leak and the F1,F0-ATPase (complex V) occurs via membrane resistance (Rm). Nerve stimulation is simulated by closing the switch in the Ca2+ branch of A, allowing Ca2+ to flow into the mitochondrial matrix via the uniporter (RCa). In B and C, a reduction in the number of active complexes is simulated by increasing RETC. The length of the vertical arrows in B and C indicates the magnitude of the changes in Ψm and IETC (respectively; IETC is current through ETC complexes) associated with Ca2+ influx into inhibited (filled arrows) and non-inhibited (open arrows) mitochondria. B and C were calculated by applying Kirchoff's and Ohm's laws to this circuit [for B, ΔΨm= Emf/(1 +RETC(Rm−1+RCa−1); for C, IETC= (Emf –ΔΨm)/(RETC)]. Parameters used in the simulations of B and C (adjusted for 1 mg protein) were Emf = 200 mV, Rm= 3 × 103Ω, RCa= 7 × 102Ω (value at half-maximal conductance of the uniporter, Magnus & Keizer, 1997). RETC in normally respiring mitochondria is ∼10 Ω (Nicholls, 1974). Capacitance (0.14 MF) was omitted because the time constant of this circuit is very short compared to the duration of Ca2+ influx. This simplified model ignores the chemical components of the driving forces for Ca2+ and H+ fluxes, assumes no changes in the concentrations of substrate or these ions, and ignores possible changes in Emf (e.g. due to depletion of NADH) and possible saturation of respiratory chain complexes. A similar, albeit more complex, equivalent circuit has been presented by Lemeshko (2002).