a, Smad6 promoter −2006/+45 and −1191/+45 were co-transfected with different amounts of Smurf1 (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8µg/dish, 6-mm culture dish) or mSmurf1 (0.8 µg/dish) expression plasmids into C2C12 cells. Cell lysates were collected 24 h after transfection, and a luciferase assay was performed. Smurf1 but not mSmurf1 inhibited the promoter activity of −2006/+45 and −1191/+45 constructs in a dose-dependent manner. *, p < 0.05, one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test, compared with vector alone. b, Smurf1 ChIP assay. C2C12 cells were transfected with Smad1 and treated with BMP-2 (100 ng/ml). Cell lysates were collected 2 h after BMP-2 treatment. The IP was performed using the anti-Smurf1 (lanes 1, 3, and 4) or anti-FLAG (lane 2, negative control) antibodies. The PCR was performed using primer set A (lanes 1, 2, and 5) (OSE2-a region, −1108/−937), B (−1968/−1839), and C (+281/+432) (negative control). Results showed that Smurf1 interacts with the OSE2-a region in the absence of BMP-2 and Smad1 (upper panel). With BMP-2 treatment and Smad1 transfection, Smurf1 was no longer able to interact with the OSE2-a region of the Smad6 promoter. c, qChIP assay. Copy numbers of the DNA fragment containing OSE2-a site (−1108/−937) in anti-Runx2 and anti-Smurf1 immunoprecipitated samples before (Input DNA) and after IP were quantified by real-time PCR using primer set A. The bars indicate final values of the percentage of the DNA input obtained from specific antibody-immunoprecipitated samples subtracting the percentage of DNA input obtained from anti-FLAG control antibody-immunoprecipitated samples. The results showed that BMP-2/Smad1 enhanced Runx2 binding and inhibited Smurf1 binding to the OSE2-a site. *, p < 0.05, (n = 4), unpaired Student’s t test, Runx2 binding was compared with untreated group. **, p < 0.05 (n=4), unpaired Student’s t test, Smurf1 binding was compared with untreated group.