Δkex1 but not Δste13 enhances the Δprm1 cell fusion defect. Mating mixes in which mating partners carried deletions of PRM1, KEX1, or STE13 singly or in combination were subjected to filter matings followed by microscopic inspection of mating pairs, and fusion efficiencies were quantitated using the GFP mixing assay as described in Fig. 2. All matings presented in this figure were conducted in parallel, and three independent trials were performed, with 300 mating pairs per mating mix counted each time. All matings are written in the form MATa × MATα. (A) Matings with deletions of KEX1: WT × WT, 92.9 ± 2.3%; Δkex1 × WT, 78.8 ± 8.6%; WT × Δprm1, 91.5 ± 2.8%; Δkex1 × Δprm1, 64.5 ± 7.7%; Δprm1 × WT, 90 ± 4.2%; Δprm1 Δkex1 × WT, 81.3 ± 6.9%; Δprm1 × Δprm1, 68.7 ± 1.6%; and Δprm1 Δkex1 × Δprm1, 30.4 × 3.0%. (B) Matings with deletions of STE13: WT × WT, 92.9 ± 2.3%; Δste13 × WT, 90.1 ± 4.5%; WT × Δprm1, 91.5 ± 2.8%; Δste13 × Δprm1, 90.1 ± 4.5%; Δprm1 × WT, 90 ± 4.2%; Δprm1 Δste13 × WT, 86.1 ± 5.2%; Δprm1 × Δprm1, 68.7 ± 1.6%; and Δprm1 Δste13 × Δprm1, 59.7 ± 5.6%. Error bars represent SD.