High peak reflux velocity in the proximal deep veins is a strong predictor of advanced post-thrombotic sequelae

J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Feb;5(2):305-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02345.x. Epub 2006 Nov 30.

Abstract

Background: The presence of reflux in the femoral vein (FV) and popliteal vein (POPV) after acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is considered to contribute to the development of advanced post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). However, a quantification of reflux has yet to be determined. The purpose of study was to determine the indicative parameters reflecting the progression of PTS.

Methods: Venous abnormalities were evaluated in 131 limbs out of 130 patients who completed a six-year follow-up after an acute DVT. Clinical manifestations were categorized according to the clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic (CEAP) classification, and the patients were divided into two groups at a six-year follow-up point: group I, C(0-3)E(s),A(s,d,p),P(r,o), early chronic venous insufficiency (CVI); group II, C(4-6)E(s),A(s,d,p),P(r,o), advanced CVI. Venous segments were examined whether they were occluded or recanalized. The reflux parameters assessed were the diameter (cm), the reflux time (RT; s), the peak reflux velocity (PRV; cm s(-1)), and total refluxed volume, and these parameters were assessed especially in the FV and POPV at the two-year (early phase) and subsequent six-year (late phase) follow-up points after DVT.

Results: There were 98 limbs in group I and 33 in group II. The frequency of venous reflux was significantly higher in group II (<0.0001). In contrast, the proportion of occlusion did not differ between the groups (P = 0.138). The proportions of FV and POPV incompetence were significantly higher in group II (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In these veins, the RT did not improve the discrimination power between the two groups. In contrast, the PRV had significant discrimination power in these veins at both the two- and six-year follow-up points. In the superficial venous system, there were no significant differences in any of the determined parameters between the groups. In group II, 19 patients (58%), who had early symptoms of CVI at the two-year follow-up point, subsequently developed advanced symptoms of PTS. After calculating a suitable cutoff point using receiver operating characteristic curves analysis at the two-year follow-up point, multivariable analysis showed that a PRV of >25.4 cm s(-1) in the POPV was the strongest independent predictor of advanced CVI [odds ratio (OR) 60.32; 95% confidence interval (95CI) 43.1-1238.97, P < 0.0001]. Similarly, in the FV, a PRV of >24.5 cm s(-1) was found to be a strong predictor of advanced CVI (OR 25.77, 95CI 10.56-331.12, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the presence of a high PRV in the proximal deep veins is an independent predictor of advanced symptoms of PTS.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Femoral Vein / physiopathology
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hemorheology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Odds Ratio
  • Popliteal Vein / physiopathology
  • Postphlebitic Syndrome / diagnosis*
  • Postphlebitic Syndrome / etiology
  • Predictive Value of Tests*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Veins / physiopathology
  • Venous Insufficiency
  • Venous Thrombosis / complications*