Which cues are available to 24-month-olds? Evidence from point-of-gaze measures during search

Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Apr;29(2):243-50. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.12.006. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

Abstract

In previous research 2-year-olds have failed to show knowledge of solidity in a search task in which a ball rolled behind a screen and was stopped by a barrier. The screen had four doors and the barrier was visible above the door hiding the ball. To establish what cues 2-year-olds might be using, precise point-of-gaze measures were taken during the hiding event. A transparent screen with opaque doors provided two cues: (1) the ball could be tracked until it failed to emerge, and (2) the barrier's position could indicate the correct door. Point-of-gaze measures revealed that children failed to use the more indirect cue of the barrier, which requires reasoning and spatial integration. Their search success was predicted only by the more immediate cue of actively tracking the ball. These findings support the claim that children use best those cues directly related to the object's disappearance, while failing to use cues that entail higher cognitive demands.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Child Development / physiology*
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cognition
  • Cues*
  • Eye Movements / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Play and Playthings*