Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
    J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1860-5.

    Optical coherence tomography to assess intrastromal corneal ring segment depth in keratoconic eyes.

    Source

    Doheny Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    Abstract

    PURPOSE:

    To investigate intrastromal corneal ring segment depth with a high-speed corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) system.

    SETTING:

    Doheny Eye Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

    METHODS:

    A prospective observational case series comprised 4 eyes of 4 patients receiving Intacs intrastromal corneal ring segments (Addition Technology, Inc.) for keratoconus. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed between 7 days and 43 days after implantation.

    RESULTS:

    The slitlamp impression of intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation depth did not correlate well with OCT measurements (r(2) = 0.68). The fractional implantation depth was correlated with several surgical variables using a stepwise multivariate regression model, and 2 statistically significant correlations were found. The position of the distal portions of the ring segments was shallower than that of the portion closer to the insertion site (P = .003). Segments placed in the inferior cornea (P = .008) experienced more distal shallowing. Shallower depth was associated with greater fractional anterior stromal compression (P = .04).

    CONCLUSIONS:

    Shallower placement of intrastromal corneal ring segments may result in more complications, such as epithelial-stromal breakdown and extrusion, because of the greater anterior stromal tensile strain. The distal and inferior portions of intrastromal corneal ring segments tended to be placed at a shallower depth. Optical coherence tomography provided precise measurement of ring segment depth and may help identify implants that pose a greater risk for depth-related complications.

    PMID:
    17081869
    [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
    PMCID:
    PMC1802100
    Free PMC Article

    Images from this publication.See all images (5)Free text

    Figure 1
    Figure 2
    Figure 3
    Figure 4
    Figure 5

      Supplemental Content

      Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central

      Save items

      Recent activity

      Your browsing activity is empty.

      Activity recording is turned off.

      Turn recording back on

      See more...
      Write to the Help Desk