Display Settings:

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ann Hum Genet. 2006 Nov;70(Pt 6):923-33.

The merits of testing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the analysis of unmatched case-control data: a cautionary note.

Author information

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. gzou@robarts.ca

Abstract

Testing for departures from the assumption of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) has been widely recommended as a preliminary step in the analysis of genetic case-control studies. Some authors suggest using a two-stage procedure in which gene/disease associations are ultimately evaluated using either the Pearson chi-square procedure or the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Other authors go further and encourage investigators to discard data that are in violation of HWE, essentially using the test as a tool for identifying genotyping errors. In this paper we show that 1) testing for HWE should not be used as a tool to identify genotyping errors; and 2) it is not necessary, and possibly even harmful, to test the HWE assumption before testing for association between alleles and disease. Instead one should inherently account for deviations from HWE with an adjusted chi-square test statistic, a procedure which in the present context is identical to the trend test. Examples from previous reports are used to illustrate the methodology.

Comment in

PMID:
17044866
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Icon for Blackwell Publishing
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk