Assessing the validity of self-reported stress-related growth

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Oct;74(5):859-69. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.859.

Abstract

The purpose of these studies was to assess the validity of self-reported stress-related growth (SRG). In Study 1, individuals with breast cancer (n = 70) generally did not report greater well-being than a matched comparison group (n = 70). In Study 2, there were no significant differences in well-being between undergraduate students who said that something positive had come out of their worst stressor (n = 34) and those who reported no positives (n = 34). In Study 3, specific domains of SRG assessed in undergraduate students (n = 96) generally were not uniquely related to corresponding well-being measures. Thus, the authors found fairly little evidence for the validity of self-reported SRG. Future research directions are highlighted.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological*
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Life Change Events*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quality of Life / psychology
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / psychology*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*